[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”0px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/www.leslinq.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/xAPI-versus-SCORM.png” alt=”scorm versus xAPI for microlearning” title_text=”xAPI-versus-SCORM” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.20.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”0px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”afc11721-7b0f-4050-a2b1-98a96a4d75fc” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Microlearning is hot! The use of short, bite-sized learning moments has proven to be highly effective for quickly acquiring and applying knowledge and skills.<\/p>\n
When it comes to exchanging learning results, the question arises as to which technical standard for data exchange works best for microlearning.<\/p>\n
In this article, we will delve deeper into xAPI<\/strong> and SCORM<\/strong>, both important technical standards used in e-learning to enable communication between learning technologies and learning resources.<\/p>\n SCORM stands for Sharable Content Object Reference Model. The framework creates and packages e-learning content, making it easy to share and use in various learning management systems (LMS).<\/p>\n With SCORM, you can share, reuse, and integrate e-learning content developed with SCORM-compliant authoring tools without compatibility issues. It promotes interoperability and enables consistent tracking and reporting of progress and performance across different systems.<\/p>\n xAPI stands for Experience API, also known as Tin Can API. xAPI is designed as a more modern and flexible successor to SCORM.<\/p>\n xAPI emphasizes capturing a wide range of learning experiences, both online and offline, and uses a simple “statement” format to record these experiences. Each statement consists of a subject (the learner), a verb (the action), and an object (the learning goal or activity). For example, “Floris completed the module on ethical conduct.”<\/p>\n The use of xAPI enables organizations to capture and analyze a broader range of learning experiences, gaining valuable insights and optimizing the learning process.<\/p>\n Both SCORM and xAPI are widely used in e-learning to facilitate communication between learning technologies and resources. While they have similar goals, there are some important differences between SCORM and xAPI:<\/p>\n SCORM is based on a detailed and standardized data model. It uses an LMS as a central host, and communication occurs through a client-server model. SCORM primarily tracks course completion, scores, and learner progress. SCORM primarily collects structured data such as scores, progress, and completion status. It focuses on tracking performance within a course or learning module. The choice between SCORM and xAPI depends on the specific needs and requirements of the e-learning project. SCORM and xAPI each have their strengths and are suitable for different situations.<\/p>\n SCORM is often used for:<\/strong><\/p>\n xAPI is often used in the following cases:<\/strong><\/p>\n Both SCORM and xAPI are proven techniques for interoperability and compatibility between different e-learning systems. With both techniques, content creators and developers can create and distribute learning modules that can be seamlessly integrated into various LMS platforms.<\/p>\n When considering the application within microlearning, xAPI offers a more advanced and comprehensive approach to tracking learning experiences. SCORM follows a more traditional and standardized approach.<\/p>\n xAPI is more flexible and provides more opportunities to collect essential data that enhances the learning experience. Compared to SCORM, xAPI offers more advantages to fully leverage the power of microlearning.<\/p>\n LesLinq has chosen to use xAPI for data exchange. This technique is flexible, modern, and offers the best interoperability and compatibility with other systems. xAPI can track and capture a wide range of learning activities and provide insights into learning experiences. In short, it is a powerful technique for a powerful microlearning solution like LesLinq.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”afc11721-7b0f-4050-a2b1-98a96a4d75fc” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n If you’d like to learn more, contact Chris Hof at 0682 077 845 or send us an email<\/a>. Would you like to see more of our new solution? Schedule an appointment for a demo<\/a>.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Microlearning is hot! The use of short, bite-sized learning moments has proven to be highly effective for quickly acquiring and applying knowledge and skills. When it comes to exchanging learning results, the question arises as to which technical standard for data exchange works best for microlearning. In this article, we will delve deeper into xAPI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7935,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-topic"],"yoast_head":"\nWhat is SCORM?<\/h2>\n
The key components of SCORM are:<\/h3>\n
\n
What is xAPI?<\/h2>\n
Some features of xAPI are:<\/h3>\n
\n
Usage in e-Learning<\/h2>\n
Technical Architecture<\/h3>\n
xAPI is designed as a more flexible and comprehensive specification. It employs a more streamlined architecture than SCORM, capturing events (statements) in a subject-verb-object format. It stores these events in a Learning Record Store (LRS) and can collect data on various types of learning experiences, both online and offline.<\/p>\nData Collection<\/h3>\n
xAPI provides a broader ability to collect and capture data. It can gather and record both structured data and unstructured data in the form of experience statements. It can also track a wide range of learning activities, such as video viewing, participation in simulations, attending conferences, and more.<\/p>\nFlexibility and Interoperability<\/h3>\n
\n
In Which Cases is SCORM Better and When xAPI?<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n
LesLinq’s Choice for xAPI<\/h2>\n
More information?<\/h2>\n